![]() Contrary to his contention, the issue as to whether claimant knowingly misrepresented material facts was raised during the May 2002 hearing. Initially, we reject claimant's allegation that his due process rights were violated. The Workers' Compensation Board, however, ultimately determined that claimant had made material misrepresentations relative to his medical history and, as such, disqualified him from receiving wage replacement benefits. Following several hearings, his case was established and he began receiving workers' compensation benefits. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.īefore: Mercure, J.P., Peters, Spain, Rose and Kane, JJ.Īppeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Board, filed September 17, 2004, which ruled that claimant violated Workers' Compensation Law § 114-a and disqualified him from receiving wage replacement benefits.Ĭlaimant, the manager of an automotive shop, sustained injuries to his head, neck and back in 2001. ![]() ![]() Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |